[Maia-users] Small anomaly in web interface, plus kicking MyS QL
Kurt Buff
KBuff at zetron.com
Thu Apr 19 11:54:57 PDT 2007
From: David Morton
> > In both cases, perhaps the number of choices could (should?) be
> > reduced to
> > two, and relabeled - something like "delete this mail" and
> "release
> > this
> > mail", and if wanted, the bayes engine could then be trained based
> > on those
> > choices.
>
> They have very different purposes though. A separate delete is
> needed to indicate to maia *not* to learn or report from this
> message. As for the other, even if it has a banned attachment, it
> is still spam isn't it? :)
That's pretty much the point of my comment - most of this stuff is either
not wanted (and therefore spam) or wanted (and therefore ham.) Deleting it
without training it - assuming that bayes is being used or that it can be
detected that bayes isn't being used and training can be ignored - seems
like a waste. OTOH, if it's unwanted, it's possible (likely?) that it's an
undetected piece of malware. Perhaps an option to report it as such would be
in order?
> > timing out. What's a better way of waking up mysqld (better
> than, say
> > rebooting, I blush to confess) if/when this happens again? Sending
> > more
> > messages didn't seem to do it. Would 'killall -HUP mysqld' be
> > appropriate?
>
> It's not that mysql has gone to sleep so much as it has dropped the
> connection. restart amavisd-maia:
>
> amavisd-maia reload
Excellent. Thanks.
Kurt
More information about the Maia-users
mailing list